Skip to main content

Category Archives: Real estate info

Fannie Mae targeted for pitfalls in short sales

The Office of Inspector General is recommending more oversight of Fannie Mae’s short-sale approvals after discovering flaws in the mortgage giant’s process.

OIG says in a report that after a review of 41 Fannie Mae short-sale transactions, it found that five servicers were failing to collect all of the required documents before determining if an applicant was eligible for a short sale. In turn, the servicers were also failing to provide the required documentation to Fannie Mae.

During 2012, Fannie Mae and its lenders approved more than 73,000 short sales, and the servicers identified in the OIG report were responsible for 34 percent of them, the report says.

OIG also says the servicers did not always conduct adequate reviews of the documents that were supplied by borrowers and failed to identify what necessary documents were missing – but still approved the short sales.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie, agreed with OIG’s recommendations of stricter oversight from its audit of the mortgage giant’s short-sales processes.

OIG raised questions over Fannie Mae’s Low FICO Program, which allows servicers to approve short sales without collecting or reviewing any information or documentation for borrowers that have a FICO score below 620 and are at least 90 days late on their mortgage. OIG urged FHFA to review Fannie’s program and determine whether it should apply to borrowers who have non-owner occupants in their properties.

Source: “OIG Recommends Tighter Oversight of Fannie Mae Short Sales,” Mortgage News Daily (Nov. 19, 2013)

© Copyright 2013 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

Nearly 400,000 policyholders will be given the option to return to the private market in November, following last week’s approval by the Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) for 10 private insurers to take out policies from the state-owned insurance firm.

Homeowners with policies that Citizens wants to transfer will receive a notice at least 30 days in advance. It will announce the name of the private insurer that’s slated to take their policy, and it will give them instructions on how they can elect to remain with Citizens if they wish. Homeowners who move their coverage to a private company also have 30 days to decide whether to return to Citizens.

“Citizens policies are becoming more attractive to private carriers,” says Citizens Property Insurance Corporation CEO Barry Gilway. “We have had success but still have a ways to go.

A key advantage for homeowners who choose to make the switch from Citizens to a private company involves the cost after a hurricane strikes: Switched policyholders would no longer be subject to Citizens’ assessments, which could reach 45 percent of the premium. Instead, they would be subject to the 2 percent assessment that could be levied on all Florida policyholders. Even then, however, the 2 percent kicks in only if event Citizens policyholder assessments are insufficient.

“These takeout efforts not only improve the coverage for many individuals but also reduce the risk of a hurricane tax on all Florida policyholders,” Gilway says.

In January 2014, Citizens will launch another tactic to cut back on the number of homeowners covered: A consumer clearinghouse, which will help match Citizens policyholders and applicants with private carriers willing to write coverage at comparable rates.

“The clearinghouse will provide policyholders with more private market options so they do not need to enter Citizens in the first place,” Gilway said.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

Nearly 400,000 policyholders will be given the option to return to the private market in November, following last week’s approval by the Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) for 10 private insurers to take out policies from the state-owned insurance firm.

Homeowners with policies that Citizens wants to transfer will receive a notice at least 30 days in advance. It will announce the name of the private insurer that’s slated to take their policy, and it will give them instructions on how they can elect to remain with Citizens if they wish. Homeowners who move their coverage to a private company also have 30 days to decide whether to return to Citizens.

“Citizens policies are becoming more attractive to private carriers,” says Citizens Property Insurance Corporation CEO Barry Gilway. “We have had success but still have a ways to go.

A key advantage for homeowners who choose to make the switch from Citizens to a private company involves the cost after a hurricane strikes: Switched policyholders would no longer be subject to Citizens’ assessments, which could reach 45 percent of the premium. Instead, they would be subject to the 2 percent assessment that could be levied on all Florida policyholders. Even then, however, the 2 percent kicks in only if event Citizens policyholder assessments are insufficient.

“These takeout efforts not only improve the coverage for many individuals but also reduce the risk of a hurricane tax on all Florida policyholders,” Gilway says.

In January 2014, Citizens will launch another tactic to cut back on the number of homeowners covered: A consumer clearinghouse, which will help match Citizens policyholders and applicants with private carriers willing to write coverage at comparable rates.

“The clearinghouse will provide policyholders with more private market options so they do not need to enter Citizens in the first place,” Gilway said.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

Nearly 400,000 policyholders will be given the option to return to the private market in November, following last week’s approval by the Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) for 10 private insurers to take out policies from the state-owned insurance firm.

Homeowners with policies that Citizens wants to transfer will receive a notice at least 30 days in advance. It will announce the name of the private insurer that’s slated to take their policy, and it will give them instructions on how they can elect to remain with Citizens if they wish. Homeowners who move their coverage to a private company also have 30 days to decide whether to return to Citizens.

“Citizens policies are becoming more attractive to private carriers,” says Citizens Property Insurance Corporation CEO Barry Gilway. “We have had success but still have a ways to go.

A key advantage for homeowners who choose to make the switch from Citizens to a private company involves the cost after a hurricane strikes: Switched policyholders would no longer be subject to Citizens’ assessments, which could reach 45 percent of the premium. Instead, they would be subject to the 2 percent assessment that could be levied on all Florida policyholders. Even then, however, the 2 percent kicks in only if event Citizens policyholder assessments are insufficient.

“These takeout efforts not only improve the coverage for many individuals but also reduce the risk of a hurricane tax on all Florida policyholders,” Gilway says.

In January 2014, Citizens will launch another tactic to cut back on the number of homeowners covered: A consumer clearinghouse, which will help match Citizens policyholders and applicants with private carriers willing to write coverage at comparable rates.

“The clearinghouse will provide policyholders with more private market options so they do not need to enter Citizens in the first place,” Gilway said.

What Turns Renters Into Home Owners?

It’s not what you know about home ownership that makes you want to own a home, but rather how you value it. Or so says a new study from Fannie Mae that concludes having a personal experience like being unable to pay a mortgage, thinking home values will fall in the future, or being underwater on a home loan don’t play a big part in renters wanting to be home owners.

The key drivers pushing renters toward home ownership are attitudes and beliefs. Those who believe “owning makes more sense financially over the long term” do indeed go on to buy homes.

Things that are much less important factors for renters:

· The perceived ease of getting a mortgage

· Knowing someone who defaulted on a mortgage

· The belief that home values will rise or fall

· The desire to have a good place to raise and educate children

· Safety

· More space and control over your living environment

The study suggests Americans’ desire to own homes is strong, even when the housing market undergoes dramatic challenges.

“Our study shows that the negative housing events of the past few years have not discouraged
people from wanting to own a home,” the study authors wrote. “Exposure to mortgage default, perceived home value appreciation/depreciation, and self-reported underwater status are not significant factors in the models predicting individuals’ intentions to own a home for their next move.”

Source: Fannie Mae

Miami developer plans implosion to clear way for multifamily project in downtown St. Petersburg

The 98-year-old Tropicana building in downtown St. Petersburg could be imploded this year to make room for a new residential and hotel complex.

Miami-based Tropicana Redevelopment plans to tear down the four-story, nearly 41,000-square-foot building at 25 Second St. N, across from Jannus Live.

The site had already been approved years ago for a multifamily project, and multifamily projects currently make up the hottest sector of commercial real estate throughout the Sunshine State.

“We feel the timing is right,” vice president Jerome Hollo said. “We love the city and what has been done to the downtown area.”

Tropicana Redevelopment, part of Florida East Coast Realty, bought the building in 2001 for $4 million. The 60-year-old real estate firm specializes in urban high-rise buildings.

Hollo doesn’t know the cost of the new project as plans are still being tweaked. He described the development as “very large.” The building is the only property the firm owns in the Tampa Bay area.

Tenants in the building were told in March to leave by the end of May so the building could be prepared for demolition. The remaining tenants are in the process of moving out, Hollo said.

The firm has not yet sought demolition permits.

Mark Puente can be reached at mpuente@tampabay.com or (727) 893-8459. Follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/markpuente.

Bidding wars are back!

A new development is catching home buyers off guard as the spring sales season gets under way: Bidding wars are back.
From California to Florida, many buyers are increasingly competing for the same house. Unlike the bidding wars that typified the go-go years and largely reflected surging sales, today’s are a result of supply shortages.
Peter Earl McCollough for The Wall Street Journal
Debbie and Bill Wetherell received multiple offers for their home.
“It’s a little surprising because we thought bidding wars were done with,” said Andy Aley, who is looking to buy his first home in Seattle’s Beacon Hill neighborhood. The 31-year-old attorney was outbid this year when he offered up to $23,000 above the $357,000 listing price and agreed to waive inspections and other closing conditions.
Competitive bidding in the current environment isn’t producing huge price increases or leaving sellers with hefty profits, as occurred during the housing boom. Still, the bidding wars caused by tight inventory provide the latest evidence that housing demand is starting to pick up after a six-year-long slump.
An index that measures the number of contracts signed to purchase previously owned homes rose in March to its highest level in nearly two years, up 12.8% from a year ago and 4.1% from February, the National Association of Realtors reported on Thursday.
“We very much believe we’ve hit bottom,” said Ivy Zelman, chief executive of a research firm, who was among the first to warn of a downturn seven years ago. Earlier this week, she raised her home-price forecast for the year, calling for a 1% annual gain, up from a 1% decline.
View Interactive

The Wall Street Journal’s quarterly survey found that the inventory of homes listed for sale declined sharply in all 28 markets tracked. Real-estate agents consider a market balanced when there is a six-month supply of homes for sale. At the height of the housing crisis, in 2008, there was an 11.1-months’ supply. In March, there was a 6.3-months’ supply.
Inventory levels in many markets were at the lowest level in years. At the current pace of sales, it would take just 1.5 months to sell all the homes listed in Sacramento, Calif., and 2.4 months to sell all the homes listed in Phoenix. San Francisco and Washington, D.C., each have 3.4 months of supply, while Miami has 4.1 months of supply.
Other markets have plenty of homes. Chicago, for example, has 9.4 months of supply, while New York’s Long Island has 16.1 months of supply. Even in those markets, the number of houses for sale is edging down.
Increased competition is frustrating buyers and their agents. “We’re writing a record number of offers, but we’re not seeing a record number of closings and that’s because it’s so competitive,” said Glenn Kelman, chief executive of real-estate brokerage Redfin Corp. in Seattle with offices in 14 states.
Nearly 83% of offers that Redfin agents have made on behalf of clients in the San Francisco Bay area this year and 71% in Southern California have had competing bids. Redfin represented a buyer that made the winning bid on a Gaithersburg, Md., home earlier this month after agreeing to adopt the dog of the seller, who was relocating and looking to find a new home for “Buddy,” a white toy poodle.
Inventories are declining for a number of reasons. Some sellers, unwilling to accept prices that are still down from their peak by one-third, are taking their homes off the market in anticipation of higher prices down the road. Meanwhile, investors have been outmaneuvering consumers for the best properties, often making cash offers that are quickly accepted by sellers.
In addition, some economists say that inventory levels are being held artificially low because Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the nation’s biggest banks have been slow to list for sale hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes they currently own. The lenders slowed down foreclosure sales and repossessions after record-keeping abuses surfaced 18 months ago.
Banks and other mortgage investors owned nearly 450,000 foreclosed properties at the end of March, and another two million mortgages were in some stage of foreclosure.
Inventories could rise, putting more pressure on prices, if the banks and other lenders step up their efforts to sell their properties. Real-estate agents say they aren’t concerned. “There’s an enormous appetite for foreclosures. Release the inventory. It will sell,” said Richard Smith, chief executive of Realogy Corp., which owns the Coldwell Banker and Century 21 real-estate brands.

The declining inventory of older homes is spurring sales of new homes. New home sales are up 16% so far this year, compared with a year ago, while inventories of new homes fell in March to their lowest level since record keeping began in 1963.
Meritage Homes Corp., a builder based in Scottsdale, Ariz., reported Thursday a 36% increase in orders for the quarter ending in March versus the previous-year period.
Even though bidding wars are pushing prices higher, many homes are still selling for prices far lower than a few years ago. Increased demand is “entirely affordability driven, which tells me there will be strong resistance to price increases” by buyers, says Jeffrey Otteau, president of Otteau Valuation Group, an East Brunswick, N.J., appraisal firm.
Rents are rising at a time when mortgage rates have fallen to very low levels. The result is that the monthly mortgage payment on a median-priced home is lower than any time since the 1990s. Freddie Mac reported on Thursday that mortgage rates fell to 3.88% for the average 30-year fixed rate mortgage, near its lowest recorded level.
Enlarge Image

Close

Rates are “so low that we can afford a house that was out of our price range before,” said Aarthi Srinivasan, who is looking with her husband for a home around Palo Alto, Calif., one of the country’s hottest real-estate markets.
Ms. Srinivasan says she fears that prices are being bid up too quickly. She says she had her “aha moment” earlier this year while touring a 50-year-old house that needed extensive remodeling. The home, listed at $1.1 million, received nearly 10 offers and eventually went under contract for more than $1.3 million to a buyer who hadn’t even viewed the property.
“There are only so many buyers who are going to be in such a hurry, so we’re hoping it’ll top off soon,” she says. On Monday, they offered to pay more than the $1.2 million list price for a four-bedroom, bank-owned foreclosure. They haven’t found out if they made the top bid.
On the other side of those transactions are sellers like Debbie and Bill Wetherell, who had 17 offers in four days for their four-bedroom home in Danville, Calif. “I was floored. It was so fast, it was surreal,” says Ms. Wetherell. The home sold on Wednesday for $796,000, more than $50,000 above the asking price.
Still, the sale is for nearly $180,000 less than what they paid for the house in 2005. Ms. Wetherell’s husband has commuted to Reno, Nev., for five years and they have decided to relocate.
Housing markets face other headwinds. More than 11 million homeowners owe more than their home is worth. It is a big reason that the “trade-up” market has been stalled. These homeowners can’t sell their current homes, let alone come up with the down payment for their next home.
Mortgage-lending standards remain tough. Real-estate agents say an unusually high share of deals are falling apart because homes won’t appraise at the price that buyers have agreed to pay sellers.
Still, borrowers with stable jobs are looking to make deals. Kelly Pajela-Fu and her husband offered to pay the asking price of $600,000 for a four-bedroom home in Marblehead, Mass., within a day of the property hitting the market.
“We just knew this house would go quickly,” says Ms. Pajela-Fu, a 31-year-old doctor who had lost out on an earlier offer. Their strategy to avoid a bidding war paid off: The sellers accepted their offer before having an open house.

Pinellas County real estate monthly indicators

Click to view the Pinellas County real estate Monthly Indicators

The media sometimes obsesses over the negatives, but last year brought several important improvements in key metrics that should not be brushed aside, such as an improved inventory picture. Foreclosures also dominate news stories, and for good reason. People should occupy homes, not banks. Which means qualified buyers need reliable access to mortgage capital, and distressed properties may need further attention in 2012 to expedite transfer of ownership and tax-base recapture. As we delve into a new year, we’re seeing mostly positive signs. Let’s examine some of them.

New Listings were down 18.3 percent for detached homes and 29.9 percent for attached properties. Pending Sales increased 2.9 percent for single-family homes but decreased 11.3 percent for townhouse-condo properties.The Median Sales Price was up 9.8 percent to $118,000 for detached homes and 14.5 percent to $85,000 for attached properties. Months Supply of Inventory decreased 39.7 percent for single-family units and 36.7 percent for townhouse-condo units.

U.S. economic data has been encouraging. The unemployment rate flirted with a 3-year low and an initial reading on the fourth quarter of 2011 GDP was in-line with expectations. Mortgage rates posted yet another fresh new record low. At the risk of sounding redundant (at the risk of sounding redundant), the missing puzzle piece is still jobs. Improvements in the labor market will spur housing demand through new household formations, improve family financials and galvanize consumer confidence.

Click to view the Pinellas County real estate Monthly Indicators

The 3.8% Tax Is Not a Real Estate Transfer Tax

Shortly after the federal government enacted sweeping healthcare reform earlier this year, there was considerable concern over a last-minute addition to the legislation: a 3.8 percent tax on investment income of upper-income households to help shore up Medicare. The tax takes effect in 2013.

Among the concerns expressed among consumers and business people, including real estate professionals, both then and today, is that the tax amounts to a transfer tax on real estate. Not true, NAR Director of Tax Policy Linda Goold says.

Here’s how the tax works. For individuals earning $200,000 a year or more and married couples earning $250,000 a year or more, certain investment income above these income levels might be subject to the 3.8 percent tax on a portion of that income. I say “might” because whether the tax applies or not depends on many factors having to do with the kind and amount of the investment income the household receives.

Investment income includes capital gains, dividends, interest payments, and, for those who own rental property, net rental income.

Importantly, the $250,000 (for individuals) and $500,000 (for married couples) capital gain exclusion on the sale of a principal residence remains in place. So, if you’re a married household that sold a house for a $500,000 gain (that’s gain, not sale proceeds), that amount remains excluded from your income calculation.

Let’s take a look at a married couple that has $325,000 in adjusted gross income (AGI), plus $525,000 in capital gains from the sale of their house.

This household would be considered upper-income by most standards. Not only is their income relatively high, at $325,000 (adjusted gross income, or AGI), but they’re receiving a $525,000 gain on their house sale. Presumably, they bought their house years ago and it’s appreciated over the years, so upon selling it, their gain is a relatively high $525,000.

For this household, only $25,000 in investment income would be subject to the 3.8 percent tax. That would amount to $950. That’s because it’s the $25,000 over the $500,000 capital gains exclusion that’s taxable.

Before they would know that, though, they would have to do a calculation that involves their adjusted gross income. They would have to add their capital gain of $25,000 to the amount of their income above the $250,000 income trigger (for married couples). Since their income is $325,000, they would add the $25,000 to $75,000 ($325,000 – $250,000), which would equal $100,000. Then they would compare the $25,000 to that $100,000, and apply the tax to the lesser of the two, which is the $25,000. Thus, $25,000 x 3.8% = $950.

So, you have a household that had income of $850,000 for the year, and its tax on investment equaled $950.

This is a simplification. Other tax issues could come into play. But it shows that the tax applies to just a portion of investment income for certain upper-income households and that the capital gains exclusion remains untouched.

Nobody likes taxes, and this tax was inserted into the legislation at the 11th hour as a “pay-for,” that is, as a revenue generator to help offset some of the costs of the reform. It’s expected to generate $325 billion over eight years.

NAR has prepared a brochure that looks at how the tax might apply under eight income scenarios: 1) sale of principal residence (which we just looked at), 2) sale of a non-real estate asset, 3) gain, interest, and dividend from securities, 4) real estate investment income, 5) rental income as sole source of earnings, 6) sale of second home with no rental use, 7) sale of inherited investment property, and 8. purchase and sale of investment property.

You can download the brochure for free. It’s written in plain language and I think you’ll find it organized efficiently, so you can see at a glance the potential considerations for the different scenarios. Of course, it’s just guidance: each household’s situation will be different, so you would want to suggest to your customers and clients that they consult with a tax advisor to make sure the tax is applied correctly in their case.

You can also get a good sense of how the tax works in the video above, in which Goold walks through a sample income scenario.

CNN money Home prices: Tampa, St. Pete & Clearwater

Report from CNN Money (click here) show Pinellas county with a -3% drop in property values over the 1st quarter of 2012. The 2nd part of this report show a huge price increase expected in the follow 4 quarters. We are already seeing a tremendous amount of activity in St. Petersburg and the beaches so far this year, including multiple offers and lots of cash sales. I’m sure the interest rates are playing a big part with sub 4% rates.

If you look at my last blog post you can see the inventory levels and the number of sales of both single family and condos on the rise. Check back with us in Mid Feb for Jan 2012’s numbers.